Ahmed Sajjad Hashemy

Israel did 9/11, ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD!!!

For the full report visit this website! Make sure to check out this.

CIA Dengue Expirements in Lahore ...

Experts in Pakistan feared that some kind of biological experiment.

MQM Logic Impresses Shopkeepers Discovery!!!

On the morning of 23rd August 2011, shopkeepers nationwide stood outside in awe.

You know you're Zionist when...

You can choose to adopt a different identity and later hijack it.

Energy Crisis in Pakistan ...

Energy is the most important sources for economic growth of a country.

Showing posts with label American. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American. Show all posts

Friday, October 21, 2011

Modern Steel High-Rises Don’t Collapse Like a House of Cards Despite Catastrophic Damage ...

Those of us attempting to present the evidence of the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center skyscrapers to the “uninitiated” can meet with significant psychological resistance. Some respond to the scientific forensic evidence quite readily. But some do not.
WTC 3 severely damaged from the South Tower debris. No complete collapse. The North Tower is yet to come down on top of it.
Another way to open the minds of skeptics – without getting technical at all – is to compare the other WTC buildings that did not actually collapse to the three that collapsed completely. Show the following photos to your stubborn interlocutor. Ask him or her to notice how severely damaged these other buildings were by the debris from the Twin Towers, yet substantial portions remained upright. And ask “Why?”.
WTC 3 after the North Tower's debris rained down on it. Still some portions remain intact.
World Trade Center Building Three was also known as the World Trade Center Hotel, the New York Marriott Hotel, or the Vista Hotel. 

Many have compared the severe damage that WTC 3sustained to the minimal damage that WTC 7 sustained, and wondered how WTC 7 could have collapsed so completely – like a house of cards – uniformly, symmetrically, and at free-fall acceleration as fast as a bowling ball falling off the top of it.
FEMA documented the distribution of Twin Tower's perimeter wall column pieces
Consider the impact that WTC 3 must have sustained for it to have been damaged as it was. Material from the Twin Towers was coming down with enough force to penetrate as many as about sixteen floors of this building. Yet, the lower floors stopped the debris, and a total collapse, well before ground level, and most sections stopped the damage far higher than that. How could any “collapse” in Building 7 – which would have had nowhere near the momentum that the falling Twin Tower material did – have continued through the entire structure of WTC 7? How could any such destruction (regardless of what started it) possibly have kept accelerating, through scores of heavy, mostly undamaged columns and hundreds of structural interconnections? Shouldn’t Building 7’s collapse have decelerated and stopped even sooner than the free-falling heavy structural steel members that were stopped by the lower portions of WTC 3? 

If the portions of WTC 3 that didn’t take a direct hit didn’t come down, then Building 7 should not have come down at all, and certainly not in the manner that it did: smoothly and symmetrically, at freefall acceleration for more than 2 seconds - and at near-freefall for the rest of its destruction. (Depending on your interlocutor’s reaction to this point, you might go on to remind him or her of the reports of sounds of explosions – including from a witness who was inside WTC 7 – and even a reported countdown overheard on a radio by a first responder just before the building came down.)
WTC 4 sustained massive damage - but did not collapse
WTC 4 is another important case in point. Though the vast majority of this building was leveled by the falling debris, the remainder was still standing. Yet no portion of Building 7 remained standing?
WTC 5 was ravaged by fire - like few other steel buildings in history. Like them, however, it suffered no collapse.
World Trade Center Building 5 was fully engulfed in flames - burning far more extensively than the few small isolated pockets of fire in WTC 7. If any WTC building was going to collapse by “normal office fires” (the official cause of WTC 7’s destruction) it would be this one. Yet, it did not collapse.
WTC 6 suffered perhaps the most extensive damage in the complex from the debris of the Twin Towers. Why didn't the remaining portions of this building fail?
World Trade Center 6 is also an important benchmark for the robust, redundant structural design of steel-framed structures. 

Given that WTC 7 failed so completely with such minor debris damage and such minor fires, anyone would find it strange that WTC 6, with a massive hole crushed into it which accounts for almost half its volume, should remain standing. 

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. The WTC 6 building had to be torn down at great effort and expense, while at WTC 7 they needed only to pick up the structural members, already dismembered from one another.
WTC 6's failure to collapse betrays the real nature of WTC 7's destruction

No formal education, slide rule, calculator, or computer model is required to know that something is very wrong with the story we’ve been given by the government engineers in their WTC building reports.

Be sure to ask your now-convinced skeptical thinker to sign our petition calling fora truly independent investigation, with subpoena power, of the destruction of all three World Trade Center skyscrapers. Anyone can sign, and every signature counts.
WTC 7's fine-grained remains lay almost completely within the building's footprint - before the cleanup crew ever got there

Thursday, October 13, 2011

The Shift ...


Today we introduce you to The Shift.  This is important because what is happening today will impact all of our lives, to one degree, or another.  Shall we get started?
If you follow the work of Strauss & Howe in their book,The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy – What the Cycles of History Tell Us About America’s Next Rendezvous with Destiny,  you may already be familiar with the concept of The Shift.  But if not, let us take a few moments for a quick refresher on the massive socioeconomic change we are in.
We begin with a discussion of a “saeculum”.  Strange word, we know.  Here is how it Wiki’s out:
A saeculum is a length of time roughly equal to the potential lifetime of a person or the equivalent of the complete renewal of a human population.
The term was first used by the Etruscans. Originally it meant the period of time from the moment that something happened (for example the founding of a city) until the point in time that all people who had lived at the first moment had died. At that point a new saeculum would start.
According to legend, the gods had allotted a certain number of saecula to every people or civilization; the Etruscans themselves, for example, had been given ten saecula.
The concept of a saeculum shows up in many ways in society, but often the concept is just below theawareness level.  A sort of “soft” thing you sort of know about but just can’t quite put your finger on.
Oh, sure, some of the sayings of our parent’s or grandparent’s generation spoke of it in many ways.  After all, they are the ones that came through the last gut-wrenching social change period known as The Great Depression.
Back then, the saying was along the lines of:
One generation makes the fortune, the next generation shepherds it, while the third generation squanders it.
And to some extent you can see that today in how the key names of the American Aristocracy of past generations are busily squandering today.  They do it with drugs, alcohol, personal quirks, and a myriad of eccentricities.  It is all over the headlines in the tabloids, yet it doesn’t quite all seem to be there.  There is something deeper.
What’s deeper are the two kinds of “long waves” in the economy.
The First Long Wave
One is the conventional Kondratieff Long Wave, named after the Russian economist who, while working for Joe “the Butcher” Stalin, provided an insight into America’s future.  He said – much to Stalin’s joy – that America would soon succumb to a great depression the likes of which the world had never seen before.  Gold stars to Joe the Butcher.
But then he made the mistake of continuing:  “America will then rise again from the ashes to be greater than ever”.  This is not something a sane person would say to Joe the Butcher, unless you want to pack on out on the next train for Siberia, which is where Kondratieff landed.
Still, his landmark work on economic cycles (using theories dating back to the 1200s when grain prices in Europe were the big thing) stands as testament that something big happens once in a very long time – and the timeline seems roughly equivalent to the Jubilee Year spelled out in the Book of Leviticus in the Bible.  Kondratieff’s neatly quantified view was that every 50 years there was a general need to renounce debts and divide up the spoils of society.  You know, those same spoils that have been spending about 50 years or so accruing to the rich.  Come the Jubilee, all debts are forgiven.
All budding economists should note, however, that the Jubilee (Lev. 25:2) was actually not 50 years, but 49 years.  And under this was a seven-year cycle, which, if you ever went to church or temple, you may remember as seven years of fat, seven years of lean.  The idea is that you take seven cycles of seven years and you’ll have stresses worked up in the economy.  This is true even if the society was simply agrarian with no iPhones, no gizmos, and no Netflix.
Suffice it to say, in the most simple of terms. that with Jubilee, it was sufficient that everyone’s interests would best served with a healthy distribution.  So, in a sense, this is really a kind of bipolar economic cycle: One generation makes it and one generation blows it.  And, so it seems, they do so in chunks.
The Second Long Wave
There’s another view of the saeculum which George Ure and Ehor Mazurok proposed more than 10 years ago.  This is an 83.5 year cycle, which is much closer to the Strauss and Howe “Turning” cycle length.  Their core idea was summarized in a January 2001 paper.  It argued that if a currency, such as US Federal ReserveNotes, is using interest, then over time that interest must depreciate the currency.  Furthermore, there comes a threshold beyond which a unit of currency may no longer be more fully loaded with debt.Is the light bulb going off yet?
Indeed, if one compares the purchasing power of a single US dollar from 1913 with the purchasing power of a single dollar today, one will find that all that remains is approximately 4.6ç worth of purchasing power.  Where did the rest go?  Essentially, it’s now diluted as debt service priced into the base currency:  the US dollar.
This is why hard money advocates who argue there should be an intractable standard of wealth – such as an ounce of gold or an ounce of silver – are so adamant about their cause.  This concept of intractable standard of wealth goes part and parcel with the larger “turning” now underway.
One difficulty with The Shift is that not everything is apparent.  Clearly, we argue, the main feature of both the Bush and Obama administrations’ economic programs has been an effort to offset the incipient inflationexpected in the Shift with a rapid printing of money.  This is no simple matter, however.  If the printing goes too fast, hyperinflation becomes apparent and gold soars.  But, if printing is too slow, the engine of deflation becomes apparent and jobs are gone.  Poof.  Jobs have disappeared and vanished on a wholesale basis with barely a scrap or two left.
Not sure we’re being square with you on this?
If you take a look at the Federal ReserveH.6 Money Stocks report, we can assure you that at publication time, the 3-month printing rate for cash and equivalents – annualized – was 36.8 percent.  In “normal” times this would signal the arrival of  hyper-inflationary nightmare.  But, couple it with heavy-duty deflation in the background and you have the basis for what we see before us today: a topsy-turvy stew of apparent contradictions, which do, upon close inspection make perfect sense, provided you’re into preserving the old paradigm and the power and wealth of those presently on top.
And everyone else?  Off they go to occupy Wall Street, the Streets of Greece, or the streets of Portugal.  You name it.  They are there and they are mad.  One could say we’re in a never-before-tried period of well-intentioned muddle-through.  Whether it is working, depends who you ask.
One of George’s readers on the Urban Survival site summarized how The Shift is being felt by young people.  He sent a description of what some are calling “The Turn” and what it has meant in his own household:
Well, it mostly fits with the mindset of my kids in one way or another.
I have a lawyer son who hates the corrupt legal system, and refuses to overbill his clients. They keep him because he is the only one that can work the SQL for retrieving email data in large cases and has a law degree. But he hates it, thinks it incredibly corrupt, and wants to change careers. “Wish there was something I could do to fix this broken system…” is a frequent lament of his. He craves change.
I have a daughter who is beer/wine manager at local grocery chain. She hates the PTB because of theircorruption. She believes in the system and in people, but that is being eroded due to watching people steal, seeing butt-kissers get promoted who have no ability, and the usual broken system reasons. She is a liberal who now thinks O is a joke. She wants a new system that is fair and where she can make a difference.
Youngest daughter just got her first double-speak about jobs. Told there was no money to give her a raise that was promised, and then watched her boss hire two of his cronies into new positions with no responsibilities. She has to deal with 65 kids, and they have to deal with 10 each and get paid twice as much. Her anger and disgust is palpable, and she sees no options in her future even with her marriage coming in November. And she has that 4-year degree too.
Youngest (20) has his friends over in evenings. They play video games, but also talk. This bunch is completely disabused of any hope for progress in the current system. They have minimum wage jobs and are going to school, but there are zero job prospects. If their shit falls apart, they would be willing to work for room and board outside the system and try something new. They have actually approached me about this, as they feel there is no reason to continue working as they are – better to have a shot at something – they smell winds of change.
Boss is a complete right-winger, and tends to blame O. And yet at the same time, waxes on about the systemic corruption and dreams of a tidal wave or hurricane plastering Maryland. Has bought place in (near Landry’s digs in OK) with cash and has plans to just exit the system and exist local up there.
Shop guys are all about self-sufficiency and living on less. All hunters and firearm friendly, and every one of them thinks the state and local systems are totally corrupt. They all want some major changes, particularly in wage distribution and banking – where they keep getting hosed by the credit card and mortgage people.
All agree that any national election will be a choice (in South Park terminology) between a Douche and a Turd Sandwich.
The restlessness and impatience with the PTB is increasing rapidly and we haven’t even gotten to the market shock or the Mideast thingy or the ice or EQ yet.
I would say the powder is very dry and ready all around us. What the MSM and PTB are NOT seeing is the anger and weariness that most people have for being lied to at every turn. There is absolute distrust of everything that comes across the news outlets for the typical American these days. The “investor class” (those with money to invest) seem to be the last ones with hope and at least a rudimentary belief in the system. But the guys in my shop? Well, about half of them no longer keep their cash in the banks after the 2008 crash.
They are all 110% disgusted by politics and governance, and would gladly climb aboard any change train passing through the ether we live in.
Just what I am seeing personally – the revolution meme fits the mindset all around me. Will not take much to engage the mechanism.”
And indeed, the mechanism is already engaging in the “Occupy” cities and much of Europe.
Whatever it is, we call it “The Shift
Part economics, part reality.  The retirement plans of the current crop of freshly arriving grays who are pulling the F.U. switch at the rate of 10,000 per day are not going to have enough money to live the golden years in a golden manner.  Nor are young people going to have jobs because multinational corporations are moving production facilities to third world hell-holes rather than comply with regulatory requirements in the USA.
But then, to make matters worse, the faceless transnational corporations (TNCs) are pouring their excessive costs on to the backs of their American business units.  As a result, major Dow component and S&P 500 component companies, in many cases, pay little or no US income tax, while the real bread-and-butter workers pay their annual tax bill without recourse and, oh yeah, they are being forced into mandatory health insurance and other socialistic fodder.And did I hear someone say the the corporations do not deserve scorn? Well, not in this crowd and not in this room.
Politically, big changes may be expected – and we will see those changes outside of the corporate duopoly.  Those experiencing the BOHICA (*bend over, here it comes again*) part of The Shiftalready know neither Republicans, Democrats, or even the short-lived idealism of the Tea Party is really serving their interests.
Strange as it seems, a coalition of the unemployed 99’ers, Roseanne Barr supporters and Union workers who are sick of things and aren’t going to take it any more may be emergent leaders of The Shift.  Those who cling to the false body of right/left politics have really missed the boat.  There is so much “juice” floating around Washington, D.C. (not to mention all the TV time given Jack Abramoff and his ilk) that American elections might be more efficiently (and maybe even honestly) handled online by eBay.
None of which should be taken as “manifesto” but rather as a statement of position.  No, we’re not planning to run down to the barricades, but we’re developing around Strategic-Living a new concept:  Strategic Spending.
Every time you give a dollar to a transnational corporation rather that a local worker in these United States, you’re casting the most important vote of your life.  Talking about a Strategic Living empowerment!
You’re voting today with your wallet for how you want The Shift to happen.  And maybe, just maybe, if enough people “get it” there will still be an “f” in the word Shift in five years or so.
Hang on and enjoy the ride,
The Two G’s – George & GayeIntroducing Strategic-Living: a practical and useful online magazine providing inspiration and guidance as we make our way through the maze of changes that are coming our way. In collaboration with my friend and colleague, George Ure, Strategic-Living will offer a synthesis ofUrban Survival and Backdoor Survival with much more detailed tips, tools and strategies for creating a vibrant and sustainable lifestyle wherever your path may take you. Think of Urban Survival and Backdoor Survival as your roadmap and Strategic-Living as your detailed guidebook. Here you will find articles and photos, diagrams and how-to’s, and a healthy dose get-out-there and do it with kick-in-the-ass inspiration.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Netanyahu to Clinton: Israel won't apologize to Turkey for Gaza flotilla raid ...


PM Netanyahu informs U.S. Secretary of State Clinton that Israel will not accept an outline for restoring relationship with Turkey.

By Barak Ravid

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has informed U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that Israel will not apologize for the 2010 Gaza flotilla raid in which nine Turkish pro-Palestinian activists died.

http://thevisioncorporation.biz/
Speaking with Clinton via telephone on Tuesday, Netanayhu said that Israel does not intend to adopt an outline to restore its relationship with Turkey.
An official in Jerusalem said that Netanyahu told Clinton that Israel does not oppose the publication of the report of the Palmer Committee, which investigated the events surrounding the flotilla, but that the date of the report's release depends on UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
The official added that the head of the UN investigatory committee, former New Zealand prime minister Jeffrey Palmer, will present the report to Ban Ki-moon next Monday and that the UN chief will release the report to the public the following day.
On Tuesday, deputy prime minister Moshe Ya'alon referred to the possibility of an Israeli apology while speaking at a Likud founders conference.
"God forbid we apologize," Ya'alon said. "National pride is not just something people say on the street but it has strategic significance. If Erdogan goes around afterwards and says that he brought us to our knees, he will appear as a regional leader in the Middle East. He won't leave it alone, even after we apologize."
Ya'alon noted that the Palmer Committee had completed its work and had ruled in favor of Israel in regards to the legality of the naval blockade of the Gaza Strip.
"The Turks are not ready to accept this," Ya'alon said. "But the relationship had deteriorated even before [the flotilla raid]. This is their policy, this is what they wanted, shame on them. So I said the Palmer Report needs to be published and I hope it will be published. Afterwards, we will meet [with the Turks]."
Netanyahu and Erdogan - Reuters
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Photo by: Reuters

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More